<<From the Guardian The authors of a recent book, Time to Eat the Dog?, warned that the energy required to feed a cat is the same as that required to build and drive a Volkswagen Golf for 6,000 miles a year.
Robert Vale, one of the authors, has said that poultry and rabbits have a lower impact than red meat and fish when used as pet food. “When feeding a pet… the advice is to think feathers and long ears, not horns and fins,” he said.>>
OK, I suppose that the energy used to make a volkswagen is spread over the whole of the cats expected lifespan – but even so this seems a little surprising – I realise that that is the point but
Can we all join in? Please post your most amazing statistics about energy use here. Note that no proof is required.
April 13, 2013 at 6:12 pm
Thanks for finally writing about >If this is true, I’ll eat
my cat | Crap Statistics <Loved it!